One of my sincerest hopes for this blog is that it will provide a forum for a discussion of alternatives to traditional practice management philosophy and practices by service firms in the United States. One such debate compares the relative merits and shortcomings of the billable hour. We have written much about this subject. For whatever reason, likely cultural in nature, our Australian and British counterparts seem to be much more engaged and progressive. Read more…
Feb
7
We do not believe the ‘benefits’ of a system based on time sheets justify the ‘costs’.
So how much does a system based on time sheets and the billable hour cost?
-Did the amount of time you spent at an arbitrarily guesstimated rate reflect the value of the service (even after you wrote it up) that would have been agreed upon with the client at the beginning of the engagement? We both know the answer. That’s a cost.
Feb
1
When I ‘retired’ from Arthur Young and Company a couple of years ago, (1978) it wasn’t because I didn’t love the profession, or the work. It wasn’t because the compensation was inadequate. It was the job. It was my employer. I wasn’t trusted. I was given an annual quota of time to fill, monitored by a semi-monthly report submitted on my time sheet in quarter hours. Annually, there was a summary of my hourly performance in comparison to my peers and to employees that I had never met, who had served before me. We complied with an arbitrary standard we had no input in setting. The majority of my waking hours were planned for me, without my input. Read more…
|
