“Rumors of my demise are greatly exaggerated.”  While I’ve been absent from the ‘blogosphere’ for a week or so, there actually was a reason.  I could think of no other way to sneak in the following post.  By being ‘gone’ I’m hoping the blasphemy of suggesting that time sheets may in fact have some value will slide under the radar.  Ok.  Here goes.  Time sheets have value  -  in a cost accounting context.  There.  I said it.

The traditionally accepted  business model for medium and small accounting firms is predicated on a revenue model that is cost based.  Value is driven by cost, and  cost is calculated as hourly rates times hours worked.   Hourly rates are established by comparison to other firms in the same market.  And then of course you have to accept the premise that every firm has identical expertise and will require the same amount of ‘hours’ to complete the engagement.

So if you have an average hourly rate times an average number of hours you have the value of the service provided.  Right?  Wrong! You may have your ‘cost’, but you absolutely, unequivocally do not have your value.   Cost accounting 101 – value is not a derivative of cost.  What you can reasonably expect to realize (value) determines the amount of  costs you are willing to incur to deliver that specific product, not vice-versa.    So why are you predicating value as a function of cost, and you are by accumulating hourly rates and billing them to your clients as the value of your services?

Typically I’ve railed against using hours and rates because I believe they under estimate value.  But be careful.   That knife cuts both ways.  In our current market, the use of hours and rates as a basis for a proposal can almost guarantee you won’t be successful.  In 35 years of practice I’ve never seen a market as cut-throat.  Frequently in our firm it has gotten down to one question.  “How bad do we want it?”  When considering any unique advantages we would normally expect to get an advantage from (industry expertise, idle capacity, contacts, etc.) we use them to get to our ‘walk away price’.  (The amount we won’t go below, regardless).  Certainly we consider ‘cost’ in proposing on an engagement, but we consider it in light of what we believe we can price the engagement at to determine our level of interest.

How do we determine ‘cost’?  Not by a standard rate.  There are other more relevant metrics.  That’s another post.  How do we determine ‘value’?  It’s unique to each potential engagement and to your firm.  Do you have a Pricing Committee?  You should.  Let’s talk about that next week.

CPAs like to get together to compare notes and try to solve the world’s problems. At one of these meetings, a fine group of partners were discussing their teams, especially in light of the recession.

When  the discussion turned to  the current economy the general consensus was that this was an appropriate time to reduce overhead by firing marginal  team members – thinning the herd.  I have two very significant problems with this concept.

Read more…

Some of the most common complaints expressed by our assurance seniors are that the client “didn’t complete the schedule request properly, or provide adequate support timely, or apply the appropriate accounting principles properly, or, or, or, yada, yada, yada”. And correspondingly the audit team didn’t meet, or, had trouble meeting their due date. (We assign due dates for projects based on budgets, and allow the team members to determine when, where and how they will perform the engagement, rather than attempting to micromanage their time and daily lives.) After hearing this refrain / excuse for the umpteenth time during one of our recent after action reports for a very good client, I reminded the offending senior of the purpose of our use of Client Service Agreements and why we have change orders. Read more…

Long known for our inability to communicate effectively either orally or verbally (yes there is a difference) as accountants we’ve found new facades to hide behind. Our communication with our clients is typically limited to brief general conversations, and written communications mandated by professional standards, such as engagement letters. The email / text message / voice mail have supplemented the traditional letter facilitating the anonymity so many in our profession seem to prefer, with the frequent result being misunderstanding or no understanding at all. Read more…

In the years since I began practicing, our profession has changed radically.  I do not want to sound like my parents and grandparents who lamented the passing of the nickel candy bar, 1 cent stamps, and walking to and from school ( up hill, both ways in the snow of Southern California), but are we progressing or regressing in terms of advancing the profession of public accounting and making it an attractive career?  What are the underlying currents that influence or even drive change? Read more…

Last week we were informed we had been selected by Accounting Today as one of the top accounting firms  to work for in the United States.  I understand there will be an article published in January, 2009.  How did we go from being a firm that had the universal difficulty of other accounting firms – attracting and retaining top talent – to being named to such a prestigious club in four years?: We changed our business philosophy, and consequently our overall approach to providing service, after following the traditional accepted approach for 25 years. Read more…

In a recent post on Trendlines, Gary Boomer held forth on the staffing crisis in our profession.  Succinct and to the point, Boomer lists four reasons.  While all four are valid, my experience over the past five years has identified one as being most significant – Firms with low retention and high staff turnover work their associates too many hours.  It’s not rocket science. Read more…

Just read Michelle Golden’s post on sending out mass mailings.  I thought it was very funny, and says so much about why we are so turned off by most of the mail we get today.

But most of all, I thought it also shows the value of criticism.  I read the other day, that the best thing you can hear as a company is a criticism, because that’s when you have the chance to improve.  If you never hear them, you can never get better. Read more…

I hailed from a large international accounting firm and like most of my coworkers there I became sick of the long work hours and never ending cycle of stress and emotional guilt tripping that comes with trying to justify going home after just ten or twelve hours. Searching for another job was difficult, as I rarely had a minute that wasn’t filled by working, commuting or sleeping. But the most substantial barrier to quitting my big accounting firm job was the myths that circulated concerning small firms. Read more…

Did you suck at ‘Economics’ in college.  I did.  So when my friend and mentor, Ron Baker, recommended that I read The Economic Naturalist by Robert Frank, I smiled politely, assured him I would, and then blew it off.  (I did buy it, just so I could document my intent and not feel entirely guilty for lying through my teeth.)  Last week, I again found myself in an airport, having mistakenly thrown this tome in my computer case, thinking it was an adventure novel.  With no other entertainment, besides trying to determine which passenger had the worst hang-over in the Las Vegas airport, I read the book. Read more…